Wattle and Daub: a vernacular tradition
- computers67
- Jul 2
- 3 min read
Updated: Jul 3
As observed by Professor Miles Lewis, AM FAHA, in his study of vernacular construction: ‘combinations of earth and timber, such as wattle and daub, are found in the vernacular in almost every part of the world.’ Combining woven timber (wattle) with an earthen plaster (daub) into walls, the technique developed independently in regions across Europe, Africa, Asia, and the Americas. It requires few tools, uses readily available materials, and can be built with minimal specialist skill. In many traditional societies, it remains a reliable form of shelter, while in historical contexts it represents a practical solution for early settlers and colonists working with limited resources or tools.
The technique came to Australia via British colonists in the late 18th century. In the early days following the European’s arrival at Sydney Cove, convicts and officials alike built huts of ‘upright posts wattled with slight twigs, and plaistered up with clay,’ as described by Governor Arthur Phillip in 1789. The method became common in the colonies not because it was ideal, but because it was possible. It required no nails, could be constructed with scavenged wood, and made use of native soils and fibres.
While Aboriginal peoples did not use wattle and daub construction in the European sense, they developed equally sophisticated building techniques that often involved the interweaving of branches or reeds, with grass, bark, or other natural materials added for insulation and weatherproofing. In Gunyah, Goondie + Wurley: The Aboriginal Architecture of Australia, Paul Memmott documents the diversity of Indigenous built forms across the continent, highlighting how these traditions evolved in response to environment, mobility, and cultural practices. Structures that demonstrate conceptually similar woven construction include the bark and grass dwellings of the Gundungurra and Wiradjuri peoples in southeastern Australia, and the layered Melaleuca (paperbark) shelters built by Yolŋu, Kuninjku, and Tiwi communities in the tropical north.
Wattle and daub was therefore a key part of the colonial builder’s repertoire, especially in remote areas where stone and brick were unavailable and milled timber was scarce. As other forms of construction such as slab huts and pole-and-pug became more widespread, wattle and daub continued to appear in modest domestic and agricultural structures throughout the 1830s to 1850s. These included homesteads, dairies, and miners’ cottages which were often intended as temporary solutions that, against the odds, have endured.
Today, only a handful of known wattle and daub structures survive in Victoria. They are rare examples of how settlers responded to the land, to scarcity, and to their own knowledge of building. Professor Miles Lewis, AM FAHA, in his extensive research on vernacular architecture, identifies these structures as ‘hybrid types,’ which demonstrate the ingenious blending of imported techniques and local adaptation.
One of the earliest and most intact examples is the state-listed McCrae Homestead (H0291) on the Mornington Peninsula, built in 1844. The building was not just a home; it was a prototype of how British traditions could be adapted to the colonial conditions in Australia.
On French Island, a partially conserved dairy hut (believed to date to the 1850s) showcases the persistence of wattle and daub in remote settings. Known as De Arths Dairy Hut (HO1), the structure comprises round-post framing and interwoven wattling still bearing traces of the original daub. In undertaking the 2009 French Island Heritage Review, RBA identified it as the only known example where the unique vernacular technique of sea-grass thatching has survived.
Another notable example is the locally significant Sloan’s Cottage in Warrandyte (HO156), a modest miner’s dwelling thought to have been constructed in the mid-19th century. Built during Victoria’s gold rush period, the cottage shows how wattle and daub was used as a stopgap construction method. It is exactly the kind of building that was never meant to survive, and yet it has.
Wattle and daub was never a prestige material. It was a technique of survival, employed when nothing else was available or affordable. As Lewis notes, despite its historical importance, true wattle and daub buildings are now exceedingly rare in Victoria. Many were demolished, eroded by time, or misidentified as other forms of mud construction. Others were hidden beneath later additions or sheeting. In fact, only a few formally documented examples remain in the state, making each surviving instance historically significant.
Comments